{"id":1887,"date":"2022-07-01T06:00:00","date_gmt":"2022-07-01T04:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/vaticanfiles.org\/?p=1887"},"modified":"2022-06-20T17:22:04","modified_gmt":"2022-06-20T15:22:04","slug":"vf203","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/vaticanfiles.org\/en\/2022\/07\/vf203\/","title":{"rendered":"203. \u201cPraedicate Evangelium\u201d – Envisioning the Roman Catholic Church of the Future"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

The constitution of a country is a kind of identity card for the country itself. Its different components, its various articles, the procedures that are enacted\u2026 they all create a window into what the country stands for and what its rules are. Since a country\u2019s identity is reflected in every change of the constitution, any change signals a modification in the self-understanding of the entity.
 
The Roman Curia is governed by a kind of constitution that is issued by the Pope as the Head of the Church and Head of the State of the Vatican. It contains the rules that preside over the functioning of the Vatican departments and offices, which are at the service of the universal mission of the Roman Pontiff. It is the blueprint of the Vatican institution and is centered on the office of the Pope and practically implemented by the Roman Curia.
 
The recent promulgation of the Apostolic Constitution Praedicate Evangelium<\/em><\/a> (PE) on 19th March 2022 gives the opportunity to examine how the Roman Catholic Church understands and organizes her institutional life as far as the present and the future are concerned.[1]<\/a> More importantly, PE shows the inherent connection between the theological vision and the institutional outlook of the Roman Church, at least from the viewpoint of the Curia. Prior to PE, the Roman Curia operated under the constitution Pastor Bonus<\/em> issued by John Paul II in 1988 and so it is also interesting to notice the changes after 25 years. The constitution defines the Roman Curia as “the institution which the Roman Pontiff ordinarily makes use of in the exercise of his supreme pastoral office and his universal mission in the world.” Furthermore, it states: “The Roman Curia is composed of the <\/em>Secretariat of State<\/em>, the Dicasteries and other bodies, all juridically equal to each other.”<\/em>
 
Of course, PE is a juridical document and some interest and expertise in canon law is needed to come to terms with its contents.[2]<\/a> The focus of this article will not so much be on the institutional re-arrangement of the Roman Curia and its organizational structure, but rather, on the theological vision that sustains it and that constitutes its framework. In what follows, I will try to look at PE from two different angles: the reordering of institutional priorities that it envisages and the significance of those priorities for the overall life of the Roman Catholic Church.Evangelicals are not always aware of the institutional picture and pay little attention to it. However, Rome is a big institution and one cannot come to terms with it without considering it. Therefore, this will be an exercise of evangelical discernment applied to the changing structure of the Roman Curia.
 
The Reordering of Priorities<\/strong>
\u201cChrist summons the Church as she goes her pilgrim way\u2026 to that continual reformation of which she always has need, insofar as she is a human institution here on earth\u201d<\/em> (The Joy of the Gospel<\/em><\/a>, n. 26). These words by Pope Francis, which are actually a quotation from Vatican II, reflect a deep conviction concerning the need for an ongoing reformation in the church.[3]<\/a> What kind of reformation did he have in mind? In some sense, PE is the institutional answer to the question asked at the beginning of his pontificate.In a nutshell, Francis\u2019 own understanding of the reformation of his Church has to do with the increase of \u201csynodality,\u201d<\/em> i.e. the involvement of many players in the decision-making process. The Pope wants to change the way the universal Church is governed, in such a way that the local church \u2014 dioceses, bishops\u2019 conferences \u2014 plays a much larger role in the decisions that affect it, without questioning the universal ministry of the Pope. In short, Francis wishes to shorten the distance between Rome and the particular churches, to ensure that they act better together. According to him, reformation is therefore a participatory dynamic in the internal organization of the Roman church in a synodical outlook. PE spells out what it means for the Pope to think and act toward this kind of reformation.
 
In The Joy of the Gospel<\/em>, the Pope wrote: \u201cI dream of a \u2018missionary option\u2019, that is, a missionary impulse capable of transforming everything, so that the Church\u2019s customs, ways of doing things, times and schedules, language and structures can be suitably channeled for the evangelization of today\u2019s world rather than for her self-preservation. The renewal of structures demanded by pastoral conversion can only be understood in this light: as part of an effort to make them more mission-oriented, to make ordinary pastoral activity on every level more inclusive and open, to inspire in pastoral workers a constant desire to go forth and in this way to elicit a positive response from all those whom Jesus summons to friendship with himself\u201d<\/em> (n. 27). Now 9 years after The Joy of the Gospel<\/em>, PE is the tool by which the Pope wants mission to be at the center of the Vatican institutional life and not just a set of activities run by the Vatican institutions. It is a change of symbolic and conceptual significance.
 
PE attempts to make the Roman Curia at the service of mission. This concern is made clear by the prominence given to the Dicastery for Evangelization, which is the first in order of the departments of the Curia.[4]<\/a> The Dicastery for Evangelization (directly chaired by the Pope with two pro-prefects in the sections into which it is divided) is formed through the merger of the Pontifical Council for Promoting the New Evangelization[5]<\/a> and the Congregation for the Evangelization of Peoples. The Pope himself takes full and direct responsibility to lead it. It has never happened before that the Pope would reclaim such a position and have such direct involvement.
 
In the list of PE, the Dicastery for Evangelization is followed by the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (which historically always had the first position among the old Congregations). The reverse of the order between the two is significant. The latter dicastery is followed by the new Dicastery for the Service of Charity, which was previously a simple Office, that of Apostolic Charity. The triadic order is therefore: evangelization, doctrine, charity. The more prominent role of \u201ccharity\u201d is signaled by the institutional upgrade from Office to Dicastery.
 
It is worth pausing for a moment and reflect on the order that is envisioned by PE. Evangelization comes first and takes priority over doctrine. Evangelization is to become the first concern of the Roman Curia. Doctrine seems to be at the service of evangelization, no longer the other way around as has been the case for centuries. The Roman Curia is no longer supposed to be primarily a defensive structure guided by a body watching over doctrine, but needs to become an outward vector at the service of the mission of the Church. The shift is indicative of the new trajectory Pope Francis wants his church to move even beyond his time.
 
PE is not a detailed plan yet, but from the institutional perspective, it signals a significant change of priority. It is as if what was envisioned in The Joy of the Gospel <\/em>has come to fruition. Through the re-structuring of the Roman Curia, evangelization and mission are now at the institutional center of the Vatican. The legacy of Pope Francis is a subject open to various interpretations. Doctrine has never received much attention by Pope Francis. Many of his critics have pointed out the doctrinal confusion if not failure in his leadership.[6]<\/a> Other aspects of his reign are receiving some pushback. Whatever one thinks of him, PE is perhaps his most important and lasting contribution and something that all people inside and outside of the Roman Catholic Church will have to deal with.[7]<\/a>
 
What Does Evangelization Mean?<\/strong>
Given the importance of evangelization and mission in the new outlook of the Roman Curia, it is important to grapple with the theology of evangelization that lies at the heart of PE. \u201cEvangelization\u201d seems to be a popular word in Catholic circles. Being traditionally part of the vocabulary used by evangelicals (and also referred to as \u201cevangelism\u201d), it has become increasingly used by Roman Catholics, too. It was Paul VI with his 1975 exhortation Evangelii Nuntiandi<\/em> who introduced it in Catholic language. It was Benedict XVI who launched in 2010 a new Vatican department to support efforts towards the \u201cnew evangelization.\u201d It is Pope Francis who regularly speaks about and practices forms of evangelization, making it a central task of the Church, as attested in his 2013 exhortation The Joy of the Gospel<\/em>. With PE, evangelization is given institutional importance.
 
\u201cEvangelization\u201d is a word that Rome has re-signified in order to suit its theological vision of embracing the world and in order to fulfill its calling to be, as Vatican II says, a \u201csign and instrument of the unity between God and mankind\u201d (Lumen Gentium<\/em>, n. 1). A similar genetic modification has occurred with  other words that have historically belonged to the Evangelical vocabulary, e.g. \u201cconversion,\u201d \u201cunity\u201d and \u201cmission.\u201d These words are some examples of the way in which Roman Catholicism can maintain the same spelling, while giving these terms a distinct Roman Catholic meaning.[8]<\/a>
 
In The Joy of the Gospel<\/em>, the \u201cheart\u201d of the Gospel is summarized in this way: \u201cthe beauty of the saving love of God made manifest in Jesus Christ who died and rose from the dead\u201d (n. 36). In this apparently Evangelical definition of the Gospel, something is missing: while the objective Good News of God is rightly related to the narrative of Jesus Christ, the subjective part of it (i.e. repentance from one\u2019s own sin and personal faith) is omitted. The tragedy of being lost without Jesus Christ is also downplayed. For this reason, nowhere in the document are unrepentant unbelievers called to repent and believe in Jesus Christ. Non-Catholic Christians are already united in baptism (n. 244), Jews don\u2019t need to convert (n. 247), and with believing Muslims, the way is \u201cdialogue\u201d because \u201ctogether with us they adore the one and merciful God\u201d (n. 252, a quotation of Lumen Gentium<\/em>, n.16). Other non-Christians are also \u201cjustified by the grace of God\u201d and are associated to \u201cthe paschal mystery of Jesus Christ\u201d (n. 254). The Gospel appears not to be a message of salvation from God\u2019s judgment, but instead access to a fuller measure of a salvation that is already given to all mankind. According to Francis, therefore, evangelization and mission are the joyful willingness to extend the fullness of grace to the world that is already under grace.
 
The word \u201cevangelization\u201d is used here; the practice of it is apparently endorsed. Evangelicals, for whom the word strikes deep spiritual chords, may celebrate the emphasis that the Roman Catholic Church is putting on evangelization, now in an embedded form in the Roman Curia. Yet a careful and honest reading of the document shows that the kind of \u201cevangelization\u201d the Pope is advocating for here is something utterly distant from the biblical meaning of the word.
 
Apart from Evangelii Gaudium<\/em>, the most recent encyclical All Brothers<\/em><\/a> (2020) is another window  into Pope Francis\u2019 theology of evangelization. In this document, Francis pleads the cause of universal fraternity and social friendship. Although it does not directly deal with evangelization, it nonetheless shapes the missiological framework of Francis\u2019 theology of evangelization.
 
Among other issues, All Brothers<\/em> raises a soteriological question. If we are all brothers as we are all children of God, does this mean that all will be saved? The whole encyclical is pervaded by a powerful universalist inspiration that also includes atheists (n. 281). Religions in the broad sense are always presented in a positive sense (nn. 277-279) and there is no mention of a biblical criticism of religions nor of the need for repentance and faith in Jesus Christ as the key to receiving salvation. Everything in the encyclical suggests that everyone, as brothers and sisters, will be saved. Evangelization is surely impacted by this assumption.
 
Then there is a Christological issue. Even though Jesus Christ is referred to here and there, his exclusive and \u201coffensive\u201d claims are kept silent. Francis wisely presents Jesus Christ not as the \u201ccornerstone\u201d on which the whole building of life stands or collapses, but as the stone only for those who recognize him. Above Jesus Christ, according to the encyclical, there is a \u201cGod\u201d who is the father of all. We are children of this \u201cGod\u201d even without recognizing Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior. Jesus is thus reduced to the rank of the champion of Christians alone, while the other \u201cbrothers\u201d are still children of the same \u201cGod\u201d regardless of faith in Jesus Christ. Evangelization cannot escape from being shaped by this shallow Christology.
 
Thirdly, there is an ecclesiological issue. If we are all \u201cbrothers,\u201d there is a sense in which we are all part of the same church that gathers brothers and sisters together. The boundaries between humanity and church are so nonexistent that the two communities become coincident. Humanity is the church and the church is humanity. This is in line with the sacramental vision of the Roman Catholic Church which, according to Vatican II, is understood as a \u201csign and instrument of the unity of the whole human race\u201d(Lumen Gentium<\/em>, n. 1). According to All Brothers<\/em>, the whole of the human race belongs to the church not on the basis of faith in Jesus Christ, but on the basis of a shared divine sonship and human fraternity.
 
After sampling the theology of evangelization in Francis\u2019 programmatic documents, it is useful to compare it with standard evangelical accounts of evangelization. According to the 1974 Lausanne Covenant<\/em><\/a>, perhaps the most representative evangelical document of the 20th<\/sup> century, evangelism is \u201cthe proclamation of the historical, biblical Christ as Saviour and Lord, with a view to persuading people to come to him personally and so be reconciled to God\u201d (n. 4). Notice the different elements of this neat and clear definition: \u201cproclamation,\u201d \u201chistorical and biblical Christ,\u201d \u201cpersuasion,\u201d and the emphasis on one\u2019s personal reconciliation to God.
 
What \u201cevangelization\u201d is talked about in PE? The immediate answer is that of The Joy of the Gospel<\/em> and All Brothers<\/em>, and this is not really good news for Evangelicals. The word is the same, but the meaning is far different.[9]<\/a> In its understanding and practice of evangelization, the Roman Catholic Church legitimately brings in the whole of its theological system, which is based on a combination of the Bible and traditions, Christ and the saints, faith and folk piety, and so on. Its evangelization promotes and commends this kind of blurred and erroneous gospel. Before celebrating the fact that with PE the Roman Catholic Church has become seriously engaged in evangelization, one needs to understand what kind of evangelization Rome stands for: it is a flawed view of what \u201cpreach the Gospel\u201d means according to the Bible.
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

[1]<\/a> So far the text of PE is only available in Italian. This explains why the document has so far received less attention than what it would deserve.
[2]<\/a>An introductory presentation of PE can be found in G. Ghirlanda, \u201c\u2018Praedicate Evangelium\u2019 sulla Curia romana\u201d, La Civilt\u00e0 Cattolica<\/em> 4123 (2\/16 aprile 2022) pp. 41-56 and O.A.R. Maradiaga, Praedicate Evangelium. Una nuova curia per un tempo nuovo<\/em> (Roma: Pubblicazioni Clarettiane, 2022).
[3]<\/a>Cfr. A. Spadaro \u2013 C.M. Galli (edd.), La riforma e le riforme nella chiesa<\/em> (Brescia: Queriniana, 2016).
[4]<\/a>Here is the list of the dicasteries as they are arranged by PE: Dicastery for Evangelization; Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith; Dicastery for the Service of Charity\u00a0(formerly the Office of Papal Charities); Dicastery for the Eastern Churches; Dicastery for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments; Dicastery for the Causes of Saints; Dicastery for Bishops; Dicastery for the Clergy; Dicastery for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life; Dicastery for the Laity, Family and Life; Dicastery for Promoting Christian Unity; Dicastery for Interreligious Dialogue; Dicastery for Culture and Education; Dicastery for Promoting Integral Human Development; Dicastery for Legislative Texts; Dicastery for Communication.
[5]<\/a>The Council for Promoting the New Evangelization was created by Pope Benedict XVI in 2010<\/a>.
[6]<\/a>See my \u201c\u2018Confusion\u2019 and \u2018Failure\u2019: Other Roman Catholic Blows Against Pope Francis\u201d<\/a>, Vatican Files<\/em> (March 1st, 2019) and \u201cIs the Pope Catholic?\u201d, Unio Cum Christo<\/em> (2022) forthcoming.
[7]<\/a>As an aside, another important nuance that PE introduced has to do with the possibility for a lay person to preside over a dicastery, and this by virtue of the principle that “the power of governance in the Church does not come from the sacrament of orders, but from the canonical mission” received by the Pope with the conferral of office.
[8]<\/a>In my book Same Words, Different Worlds: Do Roman Catholics and Evangelicals Believe the Same Gospel?<\/em> (London: IVP, 2021), I explore words such are \u201cgeneration,\u201d\u201cjustification,\u201d\u201ccross,\u201d etc. showing that the way these words are understood by Rome is significantly different from their biblical meaning.On Rome\u2019s attempt at redefining biblical words, see my article \u201cLeft Without Words. How Roman Catholicism is Reshaping the Evangelical Vocabulary,\u201d<\/a>Vatican Files<\/em> (April 1st, 2013).
[9]<\/a>In Same Words, Different Worlds<\/em>, cit. I argue that while Rome uses the same words of the gospel, its account of the gospel is flawed because the Roman Catholic Church is not committed to Scripture Alone as its foundational principle and therefore its understanding of the Bible is determined by non-biblical sources.<\/p>\n

\"Share<\/a>