{"id":278,"date":"2012-05-07T22:54:20","date_gmt":"2012-05-07T20:54:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/vaticanfiles.org\/?p=278"},"modified":"2013-06-27T16:40:20","modified_gmt":"2013-06-27T14:40:20","slug":"37-the-catholic-church-in-its-essence-reality-and-mission","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/vaticanfiles.org\/en\/2012\/05\/37-the-catholic-church-in-its-essence-reality-and-mission\/","title":{"rendered":"37. The Catholic Church in its Essence, Reality and Mission"},"content":{"rendered":"

Both the topic and the author make this book a must read for all who are interested in present-day Roman Catholicism. Katholische Kirche. Wesen, Wirklichkeit, Sendung<\/i> (The Catholic Church. Essence, Reality, Mission<\/i>)[1]<\/a> is the last volume by Cardinal Walter Kasper, one of the most interesting voices of contemporary Roman Catholic theology. In a 500 plus page book Kasper, now 80 years old, outlines both his theological pilgrimage in the Church and the main tenets of Catholic ecclesiology with particular reference to Vatican II. The book therefore combines autobiographical narratives and thick theological arguments.<\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Kasper\u2019s previous works (e.g. Jesus the Christ<\/i>, 1976, and The God of Jesus Christ<\/i>, 1984) made him one of the leading theologians after Vatican II, sometimes aligned to \u201cprogressive\u201d tendencies, but always within the borders of mainstream catholicity. The fact that he was made cardinal and then President of the Pontifical Council for Christian Unity (2001-2010) testifies to his \u201corthodoxy\u201d from the Vatican\u2019s point of view. Unlike Ratzinger, he did not take part at the Council, though he has been a fervent advocate of it, especially the call for renewal within the Tradition that Vatican II reflected.<\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 At times, he has been played against the \u201cconservative\u201d Ratzinger, but to no avail. For instance, ten years ago a controversy was mounted around an ecclesiological issue between the two, i.e. the ontological primacy of the \u201cone\u201d Church over the particular churches (Ratzinger\u2019s view), or the \u201cparticular\u201d churches (Kasper\u2019s) over the one Church. In other words, does the \u201cone and catholic\u201d Church come first and express itself in the particular churches or do the \u201cmany and particular\u201d churches constitute the one Church? The solution was very catholic: et-et<\/i>, both-and, with Ratzinger continuing to stress the \u201cone\u201d and Kasper underlining the \u201cmany\u201d!<\/p>\n

1. A Vatican II Ecclesiology <\/i><\/p>\n

This book is the result of a lifetime of reflection on the Catholic Church, its sacramental reality, dogmatic apparatus, historical tradition, and present-day problems and challenges. Kasper pays tribute to his theological fathers that made a lasting impression on him: the XIX century Catholic school of T\u00fcbingen (J.S. Drey and J.A. M\u00f6hler) and J.H. Newman. The former gave him a \u201cliving\u201d sense of the Church as the sacramental body of Christ, the latter instilled in him the sense of \u201cdevelopment in continuity\u201d of the Church\u2019s tradition. According to Kasper, Vatican II is the child of the combination of both trends. Its overall significance can be summarized as \u201ca continuity accompanied by a creative renewal\u201d (27).<\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 The main attempt of the book is to articulate a vision of the Catholic Church around the categories of mysterium<\/i> and communio<\/i>. The former underscores the sacramentality of the Church, i.e. its being a sign and instrument of communion with God and of the unity of mankind. The latter underlines its catholicity, i.e. the ability to join together both past and future, faith and reason, grace and works, Roman institutions and catholic afflatus, clergy and laity, papacy and movements, living and dead, Christ and Mary, and so on. To this thick Roman Catholic view, Protestant accounts of the church appear to be marred by \u201cecclesiological docetism\u201d (158) and the difference between the two is \u201cfundamental\u201d (263). Whereas the Church of Jesus Christ subsists in the Roman Catholic Church in its fullness, it also exists in other Christian communities, though in defective ways. Kasper adheres to the \u201ctiered concept\u201d of the Church (261 and 293) whereby the Roman Catholic Church stands in the center and other churches revolve around it depending on their proximity or distance from it.<\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 This is standard Vatican II ecclesiology. Kasper hopes that the \u201cspirit\u201d of the Council will continue to breathe in the Roman Catholic Church to encourage renewal within the parameters of Tradition. In spite of past real or fictional controversies, this program is very close to that of Pope Benedict XVI\u2019s.<\/p>\n

2. The Missing Interaction with Modern Evangelical Theology<\/i><\/p>\n

Throughout the book Kasper interacts with Martin Luther\u2019s writings and theology. The German reformer is read with respectful criticism. His main fault was that he broke with the institutional Church whereas other saints, though critical of, never rebelled against it and its magisterium (229). Other XVI century reformers are less present in Kasper\u2019s horizon. This is understandable given his German provenance. Of course the Cardinal is also very well versed in ecumenical theology and makes extensive use of its history, dialogues and literature, especially those that stem from Eastern Orthodox, mainline Protestant and Anglican churches.<\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 There is only one passing reference to the \u201cEvangelical movements and communities\u201d (53) which are associated with the Global South. Unfortunately, there is not a single reference to a present-day Evangelical theologian or to a significant Evangelical movement such as Lausanne. Given the fact that Kasper was the President of the Pontifical Council for Christian Unity for nearly ten years, it seems that his \u201cprofessional\u201d interaction with Evangelicals did not raise his interest towards Evangelical theology. There may be a number of reasons for that: 1. A bias concerning Evangelical theology that is not perceived as a serious discourse deserving attention; 2. An evaluation of the Evangelical movement that is not seen as having a coherent or interesting theology worth interacting with (especially its ecclesiology); 3. A lack of Evangelical self-awareness that makes it difficult for Evangelicals engaged in dialogue with Catholics to use Evangelical sources and literature as their working tools; 4. A defective penetration of Evangelical books in official Roman Catholic circles.<\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 There may also be a combination of those. The fact is that Kasper is abreast with both Catholic and non-Catholic present day theology, except with Evangelical theology. And this is not very catholic.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Leonardo De Chirico<\/p>\n

leonardo.dechirico@ifeditalia.org<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Rome, 7th<\/sup> May 2012<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n
\n
\n

[1]<\/a> I read the Italian edition: Chiesa cattolica. Essenza, realt\u00e0, missione<\/i> (Brescia: Queriniana, 2012). References to page numbers refer to this edition<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\"Share<\/a>