{"id":2124,"date":"2025-08-01T06:00:00","date_gmt":"2025-08-01T04:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/vaticanfiles.org\/?p=2124"},"modified":"2025-07-18T10:17:08","modified_gmt":"2025-07-18T08:17:08","slug":"vf244-the-puzzle-of-pope-leo-xiv","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/vaticanfiles.org\/es\/2025\/08\/vf244-the-puzzle-of-pope-leo-xiv\/","title":{"rendered":"244. The Puzzle of Pope Leo XIV. Towards a Geopolitics of the New Papacy"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

It is still too early to get an idea of \u200b\u200bwhat Leo XIV’s papacy will be like. Only now are the first biographies starting to come out (e.g. Matthew Bunsun, Leo XIV. Portrait of the First American Pope<\/em><\/a>, 2025; Christopher White, Pope Leo XIV. Inside the Conclave and the Dawn of a New Papacy<\/em><\/a>, 2025; Antonio Preziosi, Leone XIV. La via disarmata e disarmante<\/em><\/a>, 2025), generally with a hagiographic or journalistic tone. While Pope Prevost takes his first steps, many are starting to ask what his main directions and priorities will be.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For now, it is possible to move by clues and traces that need to be collected and interpreted. On the geopolitical front, the magazine Limes<\/em> has tried to draw a conceptual map for what lies ahead for Pope Leo. The Roman Catholic Church, with the Vatican at its center, is also a player on the global chessboard; it represents 1.4 billion people (18% of the world’s population), has diplomatic relations with most countries, and has a say in the main documentation of global politics. It is not surprising that a geopolitical magazine dedicated an entire issue to it: The Puzzle of Pope Leo<\/em>, Limes<\/em><\/a> (5\/2025).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The starting point is precisely the choice of the word “puzzle,” i.e. a picture to be guessed from the few available elements. Here are some suggestions from the various articles, many coming from political scientists, journalists, and (a few) theologians of moderate progressive culture, with the exception of R. Reno, editor of the conservative American magazine First Things<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

First, the person of the pope is bearer of unusual traits<\/a>: a “Latin Yankee,” a “Pan-American” man, a Euro-American, a personality with a \u201chybrid\u201d cultural identity and a calm and determined character. A “lion” among other global lions (e.g. Trump, Putin, Xi Jinping). A son of the Fourth Rome (the USA) on the throne of the First Rome in a world where overall balances are being redefined in the presence of wars and threats of war. The initial impression is that, after the geopolitical shuffling of cards by Francis (who appeared hostile to Ukraine and Israel, subject of China, and emotionally distant from the US and Europe), Leo brings the boat of Peter to sail in the direction of the Atlanticism that was of John Paul II, slender towards the West and skeptical about the still \u201cfar\u201d East (e.g. China). It is true that there would have been no Leo XIV without Francis, but the current pope is not a replica of the previous in the geopolitical positioning of the Church of Rome.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The choice of the name Leo is another clue that many observers focus on. Leo XIII, the predecessor in choosing the name, wrote the encyclical “Rerum Novarum<\/em><\/a>” (1891), which opened the Catholic Church to the social question and living conditions of workers. Leo XIII inaugurated the era of the Social Doctrine of the Catholic Church. The analysts of Limes<\/em> read in Prevost\u2019s choice to call himself Leo the commitment to address the social issue par excellence of this generation: artificial intelligence (AI). There are already signs in this direction, but many expect an encyclical (i.e. the highest authoritative document by a Pope) dedicated to AI, believing that the Roman Catholic Church is the only global moral agency able to subvert the exclusive interests of the war industry and the techno-globalist powers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Another piece of the Leo puzzle is its relationship with the USA and North American Catholicism. As is well known, Francis was not loved by a consistent part of American Catholics, and financial support for Rome\u2019s budget has decreased significantly over the years, also due to American disaffection with Pope Francis. Now, Leo is asked to sew up the tear and restart the donations that the Catholic Church desperately needs for its bleeding budgets. Then there is the relationship with the US Administration, especially with the “catholic” vice president, J.D. Vance, who interprets a conservative Catholicism but is not exactly deferential towards ecclesiastical authorities. Soon after his election, there has been no lack of opportunities for polemics between Vance and the Vatican on migration policy and also on the interpretation of the ordo amoris<\/em>, i.e. the differentiated responsibilities of Roman Catholic action. Leo XIV faces the challenge of resetting and re-establishing relationships, keeping together the legacy of Francis and the American Catholic system.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

A final consideration needs to address the relationship with Protestantism, although limited to the US context. Many of the geopolitical issues at stake involve “ecumenical” relations with the Orthodox patriarchates of Moscow and Kiev, or inter-religious relations such as those with the Jewish world. But what about Protestantism? Many observers (by the way, all Catholic, some practicing, most nominal) note the state of “crisis” of American Protestantism: polarized, jagged, angry, flattened with or against Trump, under the shadow cone of politics rather than living in its own light. The crisis also has to do with the nationalist culture that, for them, is a child of Protestant individualism. In their view, in the fractured context of North American society, Catholic communitarianism (i.e. the Catholic insistence that human life is life-in-community in the context of the Catholic Church) would be better equipped than Protestant individualism to offer a prospect not only of economic wealth but also of social welfare. In this sense, “Rome alone” would be able to build a third way between the woke culture of the left and the nationalism of individualistic conservatism. There is an expectation that Pope Leo will be able to exert an attraction from Protestantism towards Roman Catholicism in American society. Evangelicals should be aware of these trends and consider Rome as a spiritual competitor rather than an ally, due to her different account of the gospel from the biblical one.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

These analyses are not theological and do not grasp central elements of the papacy as an ecclesiastical institution which is based on doctrinal commitments. In this sense, they only grasp the \u201cpolitical\u201d side of Rome but not her theological vision. However, they can help start to put together the pieces of the beginning of this pontificate puzzle.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n
\"Share<\/a>