{"id":1734,"date":"2020-06-01T06:00:00","date_gmt":"2020-06-01T04:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/vaticanfiles.org\/?p=1734"},"modified":"2020-05-27T10:28:16","modified_gmt":"2020-05-27T08:28:16","slug":"vf176","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/vaticanfiles.org\/nl\/2020\/06\/vf176\/","title":{"rendered":"176. \u201cTotus tuus\u201d (to Mary). The Unsettled Legacy of John Paul II One Hundred Years since His Birth"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Karol Wojty\u0142a (1920-2005), since1978 better known as Pope John Paul II, has been one of\nthe most influential men of the 20th<\/sup> century. The centenary of his\nbirth is a useful opportunity to reflect on his legacy. A quick look at the\ntitles of biographies about him shows the magnitude of the man: The Man of the End of the Millennium<\/em> (L.\nAccattoli), Witness to Hope<\/em> (G.\nWeigel), The Man of the Century <\/em>(J.\nKwitny), Pilgrim of the Absolute<\/em> (G.\nReale), The Defeater of Communism<\/em> (A.\nSantini). As is always the case with human analyses of human biographies,\ncelebrative voices abound as well as critical readings, especially coming from\nprogressive sectors of the Roman Catholic Church and from left-wing analysts.\nOther titles point to the controversial aspects of his life: Victory and Decline<\/em> (C. Cardia), The\nPope in Winter: The Dark Face of John Paul II\u2019s Papacy<\/em> (J. Cornwell), The Wojty\u0142a Enigma<\/em> (J. Arias), The Last\nPope King<\/em> (L. Sandri).      <\/p>\n\n\n\n

His life was at the centre of the major affairs of the 20th<\/sup> century: the tragedy of Nazism and the trauma of the Second World War, the apex and fall of Communism, the Second Vatican Council and its debated implementation, the apparent triumph of Western democracy and the oppressive costs of globalization for the Majority world, the fracture of ideologies and the rise of secular hedonism. Wojty\u0142a played a significant role in all these major events. Supporters have acclaimed his achievements in terms of navigating, surviving and overcoming the dangerous streams of our post-something world. Critics have pointed out the double-faced, contradictory trajectory of his life and his very backward-looking Catholic outlook.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How do we assess John Paul II\u2019s legacy? Because of the stature of the man, the question is overwhelming in every respect. Amongst the vast amount of books available, one guide worth noting in particular is Tim Perry\u2019s edited book The Legacy of John Paul II: An Evangelical Assessment<\/em><\/a> (2007). The chief point of interest is that it is one of the few attempts to provide an evaluation from an Evangelical point of view. The book bears witness to the fact that it was under John Paul II that Evangelical attitudes toward Roman Catholicism began to change and become friendly, if not even cooperative. This Pope was the one who called his Church to be engaged in mission, encouraged the pro-life front, welcomed some of the Evangelical concerns related to Bible literacy and liturgical variety, and seemed to be closer to the Majority world than his predecessors. It also witnesses to the fact that some Evangelicals today speak of the Pope as \u201cHoly Father\u201d (e.g. Timothy George, pp. 309-312) \u2013 something that is not biblically natural. Moreover, in evaluating the overall theology of his 14 encyclicals, some Evangelicals can say that it is \u201cBible-based, humanity-focused, Christ-centered and mission-attuned\u201d (e.g. J.I. Packer, p. 8) \u2013 something that sounds like a full endorsement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Certainly there has been a significant shift of attitude, and John Paul II has made quite an impression on many Evangelicals. The book edited by Perry contains positive comments on each encyclical signed by Wojty\u0142a, and the tone is close to admiration, with some minor criticism. Of course much of it is a fair summary of what the Pope wrote, if selective in many ways. For instance, there is no mention that each encyclical ends with an invocation to Mary, which does not represent a Christocentric and biblical pattern. Moreover, there is little recognition of the fact that, besides the Bible, papal encyclicals quote sources of the tradition of the Church even more extensively. The Bible is only one<\/em> source amongst many, and apparently not the decisive one. On specific contents, Fides et Ratio<\/em> (Faith and Reason<\/em>, 1998) combines Aristotelian reason and Thomistic faith, a choice that leaves out many Biblical strands. Ecclesia de Eucharistia<\/em> (The Church from the Eucharist<\/em>, 2003) reinforces the traditional Roman Catholic doctrine of the sacrificial nature of the Eucharist, its re-enactment of Jesus\u2019 death and the practice of adoration of the host. Ut Unum Sint<\/em> (That They Be One<\/em>, 1995) claims that the Pope is willing to change the forms of his universal ministry, but not the substance of his petrine office that supplements the headship of Christ over the church. Redemptoris Mater<\/em> (The Mother of the Redeemer<\/em>, 1987) is a Marian-centered re-telling of salvation history, which is something that the Bible does not encourage, as the Bible wants people to see Christ (not Mary) in all the Scriptures. The list could go on and on. On the whole it seems that the Evangelical writers of these chapters only want to look at the alleged \u201ccommon ground\u201d that they find in the writings by John Paul II, and are unable or unwilling to see what is contrary to basic gospel truths, let alone to denounce it. The book is therefore informative but of limited use for an evangelical evaluation of the legacy of Karol Wojty\u0142a.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

One\nfinal point must be further elaborated. Marian devotion was a characterizing feature of John Paul II\u2019s\nlife. He believed the so-called secrets of Fatima, in which Mary played\na decisive role, deviating the bullet when the Pope\nwas shot in 1981 by the terrorist Ali A\u011fca.\nApparently, the Pope believed in Marian providence, considering Mary a major\nplayer in world affairs, both earthly and cosmic, both material and spiritual. For this reason he was able to dedicate planet earth\nto her at the beginning of the new millennium, along with the human family and\nnew century, pleading for protection\nand guidance all the while. Moreover, his\npersonal motto was totus tuus<\/em>,\ntotally yours, with \u201cyours\u201d referring to Mary.\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His\nlegacy is therefore difficult to square with the \u201cChrist-centered\u201d focus that\nsome would want to see in it. John Paul II embodied a full Roman Catholic\nmindset, apparently strong on every aspect of the Roman Catholic identity. He\nhas been very \u201cRoman\u201d and very \u201cCatholic\u201d at the same time. <\/p>\n

\"Share<\/a>