{"id":842,"date":"2014-06-17T10:27:43","date_gmt":"2014-06-17T08:27:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/vaticanfiles.org\/?p=842"},"modified":"2014-06-17T10:34:29","modified_gmt":"2014-06-17T08:34:29","slug":"82-a-mini-assisi-for-the-holy-land","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/vaticanfiles.org\/ro\/2014\/06\/82-a-mini-assisi-for-the-holy-land\/","title":{"rendered":"82. A Mini-Assisi for the Holy Land?"},"content":{"rendered":"

June 17th, 2014<\/em><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Assisi is the small town where Francis of Assisi (1181- 1226) lived most of his life and is now a destination for thousands of pilgrims every year. Assisi is also the place where in 1986 Pope John Paul II convened a prayer meeting for peace where different religious leaders came together to pray, each one in his own way and to his own G\/god(s). This inter-religious prayer initiative raised some concerns within the Catholic Church as well as outside of it. Was it an endorsement of religious universalism? Was it a way to downplay the exclusive claims of the Gospel? Did it give the impression that all religions are equal? What kind of theology supported that inter-faith and multi-religious prayer? Although Pope Benedict tried to address some of these issues, this debate continues.\u00a0 <\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Now Pope Francis has entered the debate in a most unpredictable way. During his recent visit to the Holy Land he invited the Israeli President Shimon Peres and the Palestinian leader <\/span>Mahmoud Abbas to pray for peace in the region (June 8th<\/sup>). In a way this was a mini-Assisi type of event.<\/span><\/p>\n

The Power of Symbols and the Inherent Confusion<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n

The prayer took place in the Vatican, but the scene was very similar to what happened in Assisi. The Pope (dressed in his usual white robes) sat at the center of a semi-circle, with the Israeli and Palestinian delegations (all dressed in dark black suits) at his right and left hand sides. St. Peter\u2019s cupola overshadowed them all. It was the same setting of Assisi with the Pope being recognized as the \u201ccenter\u201d of inter-faith dialogue and presiding over inter-religious prayers. In their short speeches both Peres and Abbas readily praised the strategic leadership of the Pope in bringing reconciliation. All the symbols present strongly supported the view that the Papacy is a key institution in bringing the whole of humanity together.<\/span><\/p>\n

The main difference is that in Assisi John Paul II had invited religious leaders whereas Francis brought political<\/i> leaders together to pray. No matter what one thinks of inter-faith prayer, the 1986 event was at least coherent in that it called religious leaders to take part. Now, Francis wanted presidents to pray with him instead. The significance of this can be hardly overestimated. The Pope is also head of a state (i.e. the Vatican City) and therefore wears two hats, so to speak. He is a peer of both religious and political leaders. In asking the Israeli President to pray a Jewish prayer and the Palestinian President to pray a Muslim prayer, however, he wrongly attributed to them the role of being representatives of the majority religions of their countries. He exchanged their responsibilities of representing all<\/i> citizens (e.g. Israeli Christians and Palestinian Christians included) by giving them the hat of Jewish and Muslim religious leaders.<\/span><\/p>\n

The confusion lies at the heart of the Roman Catholic Church. Because the Pope is both a religious leader and a head of state the distinction between what belongs in the realms of both religion and state is significantly blurred. Francis invited his fellow heads of state and asked them to perform a religious duty as if they were religious leaders. He projected his own dual-identity (religious and political) onto his guests. This in no way represents a healthy relationship between the two spheres.<\/span><\/p>\n

Standing Perplexities<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span>The 2014 mini-Assisi gathering also used similar language that was used in 1986. In his prayer Francis invoked God as “God of Abraham, God of the Prophets, God of Love” who calls us to live “as brothers and sisters”. He strongly advocated the idea that we have to “acknowledge one another as children of one Father”. “Brother” was the most frequently used word in his speech and the universal Fatherhood of God was the theological framework of the event. <\/span><\/p>\n

Now this whole language is ambiguous at best. It can be used to indicate the need for peoples of different backgrounds and religions to live together in peace as if they were brothers and sisters. Or it can mean that they are already brothers and sisters, children of the same Father, no matter what their religious convictions are. The stress on the \u201csame God\u201d idea strongly suggests that the latter interpretation is what Francis really meant. The fact that a Christian prayer (with a final invocation to Mary, \u201cthe daughter of the Holy Land and our Mother\u201d), a Jewish prayer, and a Muslim prayer were offered one after the other, all containing references to the \u201csame God-same humanity\u201d, points to the idea that all religions are in the end good in themselves, provided that they restore and maintain peace. This is actually what most people took from the mini-Assisi of Pope Francis. After the cautious reservations of Pope Benedict, the \u201cspirit of Assisi\u201d still breathes in the Vatican. <\/span><\/p>\n

\"Share<\/a>