67. ¿Encomendar el mundo a María?

15 de Octubre 2013

“Dondequiera que María es venerada y se lleva a cabo la devoción a ella, allí la Iglesia de Cristo no existe”. Si Karl Barth está en lo cierto, la Iglesia de Cristo no estaba presente el día 13 de octubre en la plaza de San Pedro cuando el Papa Francisco encomendó el mundo a María.

Se le ofreció la ocasión en la veneración de la estatua de Nuestra Señora de Fátima que se había llevado a Roma para un día mariano especial. El marianismo es una de las claves para interpretar el presente pontificado y esta celebración destaca aún más su difusión.

¿Encomendar el mundo a María?

Si Francisco parece romper con muchas convenciones por la forma en que vive su papel de Papa, es muy tradicional en lo que se refiere a su marianismo.

Encomendar el mundo al Inmaculado Corazón de María lo hizo Pío XII durante la Segunda Guerra Mundial (1942) y fue realizado dos veces por Juan Pablo II (1982 y 1984). Francisco sigue, por tanto, una tradición establecida en el siglo XX que unifica el catolicismo romano pre- y post-Vaticano II.

Estos actos son respuestas al mensaje que María supuestamente dio a los tres jóvenes pastores de Fátima (Portugal) en 1917.

La consagración del mundo a María es, por consiguiente, algo que proviene de una reciente visión mariana, sin ningún respaldo bíblico. Encomendar el mundo es una acción muy importante pero uno se pregunta si los cristianos están, en cambio, convocados o no por la Palabra de Dios a confiar sus vidas al Creador (p.e. 1 Pedro 4:19) o hacer sus peticiones al Mismo Dios (p.e. Filipenses 4:6). El mundo fue encomendado por Dios el Padre a Dios el Hijo (1 Corintios 15:27) y no hay ninguna evolución mariológica que pueda revocar esta verdad.

¿Qué significa este acto?

¿Qué significó para el Papa Francisco encomendar el mundo a María? Fundamentalmente, el Papa rezó una oración mariana que contenía una serie de declaraciones y compromisos de largo alcance que, bíblicamente hablando, son adecuadas si son dirigidas al Dios Trino, pero no si en su lugar se pone a “María”.

Una muestra: “Confiamos que cada uno de nosotros es precioso ante tus ojos y que nada que more en nuestros corazones te es desconocido”. Al llegar a este punto un cristiano ordinario preguntaría: ¿no dice la Biblia que somos de gran valor a los ojos de Dios (p.e. Isaías 43:4) pero nunca habla de María en estos términos?

Además, ¿esta afirmación implica que María conoce la profundidad de nuestros corazones? ¿Es ella omnisciente, en lo que se refiere a los atributos que pertenecen sólo a Dios? Según la Biblia, Dios el Padre conoce los secretos del corazón (Salmo 44:21), Dios el Hijo conoce los pensamientos de los hombres (p.e. Mateo 9:4), Dios el Espíritu intercede por nosotros con gemidos que no pueden expresarse con palabras (Romanos 8:26).

Otra manifestación: “Guarda nuestras vidas en tus brazos”. Se representa a María como la encargada de la defensa y el cuidado de nosotros, o sea, otro atributo que la Biblia relaciona sólo con Dios. Dios el Padre preserva las vidas de los santos (p.e. Salmo 97:10) y el Señor Jesús protege a los que le fueron dados por el Padre (Juan 17:12). Es el poder de Dios que guarda sus criaturas a través de la fe (1 Pedro 1:5). María no tiene ningún papel en esto. Por otra parte, es Dios quien levanta “los corderos en sus brazos” (Isaías 40:11). María extendía sus brazos al niño Jesús, pero en ninguna parte de la Escritura se nos dice que podemos esperar su abrazo.

Una enunciación final de la oración contiene la siguiente invocación: “revitaliza y alimenta nuestra fe; sustenta e ilumina nuestra esperanza; inspira y anima nuestra caridad”, como si María tuviera asignado este papel. La Biblia enseña que los creyentes piden a Jesús que les ayude a crecer en su fe (p.e. Marcos 9:24), tienen su esperanza en Dios (p.e. Hechos 24:15) y saben que el amor es el fruto del Espíritu Santo (Gálatas 5:22).

El problema con esta mariología papal es que es totalmente injustificada si la fe cristiana se basar únicamente en la Palabra de Dios.

A pesar de todo lo que se ha dicho en los círculos ecuménicos acerca del re-acercamiento entre los católico romanos y los protestantes evangélicos en tormo a la Biblia, este acto de encomendación a María demuestra que sus diferencias no son una cuestión de matices sino de asuntos fundamentales que se encuentran en el corazón de la propia fe.

Afortunadamente, “la Tierra es del Señor con todo lo que hay y vive en la misma” (Salmo 24:1) y no hay ninguna necesidad de confiarla a nadie más.

66. Towards a Politically Correct Apologetics?

October 3rd, 2013

Secular people and media are praising Pope Francis for being open to “dialogue” with the modern world in a way that is personally engaging and fresh in style. On his side, the Pope is taking more and more pleasure in entertaining editors, journalists and opinion makers with interviews, personal meetings, and direct phone calls. The last instance of such papal strategy for communication is a long interview that was published on 1st October by the Italian daily newspaper La Repubblica with its former editor Eugenio Scalfari, an outspoken atheist. The interview follows an exchange of letters and a personal meeting between the two men.

What seems to emerge from all these pieces is a specific apologetic strategy by Francis. Here are three steps that form the apologetic backbone of what the Pope said in the course of the conversation and few biblical remarks about them.

First Step: Disparaging Proselytism to Avoid the Hard Question about Conversion

At the beginning of the conversation, Scalfari says:“My friends think you want to convert me” and here is how Francis replies: “Proselytism is solemn nonsense, it makes no sense. We need to get to know each other, listen to each other and improve our knowledge of the world around us. Sometimes after a meeting I want to arrange another one because new ideas are born and I discover new needs. This is important: to get to know people, listen, expand the circle of ideas”.

As it is well known, proselytism is a “bad” word and has an even worse press. It is associated with fanaticism, unethical methods, and religious extremism. The Pope wants to reaffirm the negative understanding of it and in so doing he wants to build a bridge with his secular interlocutor who has a terrible opinion of it. Notice though that Scalfari had not asked his opinion on proselytism. He wanted to know if the Pope desired his conversion. Instead of answering, Francis speaks of proselytism knowing that Scalfari agrees with him. Is it ethical for a Christian not to give an answer about his conversion? Is not conversion a biblical word? Is not conversion the goal that should inspire all Christian mission? Moreover, Francis’ description of what it means for a Christian to engage in dialogue is a biblically flawed account. He speaks of “knowing, listening, expanding the circle of ideas”, but what about telling, witnessing, preaching, proclaiming the Good News? In Athens, the apostle Paul did the former but also the latter (Acts 17:16ff). Why does Francis affirm the former and omit the latter?

Second Step: Offering a “Lovely” Summary of the Gospel to Soften the Secular Prejudices

In the course of the conversation the Pope provides a summary of the gospel that suits the expectations of the secular intellectual. Here it is: “The Son of God became incarnate in the souls of men to instill the feeling of brotherhood. All are brothers and all children of God”. A little later he says: “Agape, the love of each one of us for the other, from the closest to the furthest, is in fact the only way that Jesus has given us to find the way of salvation and of the Beatitudes”.

Strangely enough, this language is very similar to the old liberal account of the gospel: a God of love wishing the brotherhood of all men. According to theological liberalism, this is the “essence” of Christianity. But, biblically speaking, it is not. In this summary there is no reference to justice, sin, judgment, atonement, death and resurrection, conversion, … not surprisingly words that are unpalatable to the secular mind. Is not the summary offered by the Pope at best a seriously truncated gospel, at worst another gospel? Is pleasing the dialogue partner and matching his expectations the primary task of apologetics?

Third Step: Reinforcing the Role of the Individual Conscience to Eschew Confrontation

At another point, Scalfari asks: “Is there is a single vision of the Good? And who decides what it is?” Here is Francis’ reply: “Each of us has a vision of good and of evil. We have to encourage people to move towards what they think is Good”. Scalfari: “You wrote that in your letter to me. The conscience is autonomous, you said, and everyone must obey his conscience. I think that’s one of the most courageous steps taken by a Pope”. Francis:And I repeat it here. Everyone has his own idea of good and evil and must choose to follow the good and fight evil as he conceives them”.

The Pope agrees that “the conscience is autonomous” and following its indications is one’s own task. No reference, however, to the lies that subjugate the conscience and to sin that mars it. No reference to the guilty conscience or the misguided one that needs the power of the Gospel to free it from bondage.

Later on, Scalfari asks: “Do you feel touched by grace?” Francis:No one can know that. Grace is not part of consciousness, it is the amount of light in our souls, not knowledge nor reason. Even you, without knowing it, could be touched by grace”. Scalfari: “Without faith? A non-believer?” Francis:Grace regards the soul”.

Is grace really an experience beyond knowledge, reason and even faith? Are all men, for their being men, already graced even without knowing it and without believing in the biblical God? To this question the Bible would say “no” (e.g. Ephesians 2:1-10).

The dialogue was politically correct and the outcome of the conversation was the following: the secular thinker is no longer nervous about his need to be converted. He is also confirmed in the idea that the gospel is about love and human brotherhood. He is also reinforced in his conviction that his conscience is what really matters. Unfortunately, the Pope seems to agree on all three points. Is this good apologetics?

65. The Pope Francis’ dogma: “God is present in every person’s life”

September 20th, 2013

Previous Popes communicated on the printed page through encyclicals and official speeches only. One of the major changes that Pope Francis is introducing is that he is reversing the balance. He speaks more through newspapers. Last week, his reply to the editor of the Italian daily newspaper La Repubblica and his interview with different Jesuit journals demonstrated this trend and the interest is evident by the broadcast media coverage generated.

The more Pope Francis speaks, the more his theology is becoming clearer. He has always said that the traditional dogmas and the Catechism are in the background of what he affirms and that nothing of substance changes in his remarks on God’s infinite mercy and the goodness within every human being. This is true only in part. Different Roman Catholic interpreters have always played with the task of putting different accents on the same sheet music and Francis is deliberately putting his preferred accent – fortissimo on an another key dogma. In light of his Marianism and mission-minded approach already elaborated, the last two written outputs and interviews have shed further light on his basic view of the relationship between nature and grace.

“A Dogmatic Certainty”

Talking to his fellow-Jesuit journalists from across the world (Sept 19th), Pope Francis said many things and these comments are attracting lots of positive reviews. Here we will focus on this particular one:

“I have a dogmatic certainty: God is in every person’s life. God is in everyone’s life. Even if the life of a person has been a disaster, even if it is destroyed by vices, drugs or anything else—God is in this person’s life. You can, you must try to seek God in every human life. Although the life of a person is a land full of thorns and weeds, there is always a space in which the good seed can grow”.

This Pope is not someone who likes to use dogmatic language, at least on the surface. Yet, here he is using the strongest language possible. He really wants to mean what he is saying. God is in everyone’s life. This unqualified statement raises questions about what the Pope thinks of the nature of sin in human life and the reality of us “falling short” of God in our sin (e.g. Romans 3:23). While teaching that those who believe in Him shall be saved, the Bible is clear in saying that we are enemies of God because we are sinners and are therefore under his judgment. The Pope, instead, wants to affirm the dogma that God is present because there is always some residual “good” in man.

 

“Obeying One’s Conscience”

One further comment by Pope Francis reinforces his dogmatic view on man’s inherent openness to God’s presence. Responding to the editor of La Repubblica (Sept 11th), he writes the following:

“You ask me if the God of Christians forgives one who doesn’t believe and doesn’t seek the faith. Premise that – and it’s the fundamental thing – the mercy of God has no limits if one turns to him with a sincere and contrite heart; the question for one who doesn’t believe in God lies in obeying one’s conscience. Sin, also for those who don’t have faith, exists when one goes against one’s conscience. To listen to and to obey it means, in fact, to decide in face of what is perceived as good or evil”.

Put simply: obeying one’s conscience is what God will take account of in granting forgiveness. Notice that the Pope here is not speaking of those who have never heard the gospel, but of those who don’t believe it knowing what they are doing. Apparently, to go against one’s conscience counts more than going against God’s revelation. Although the Bible teaches there is no excuse before God’s righteous judgment (e.g. Romans 2:1), Francis here says that that the conscience is the final judge to whom God will submit himself. The human conscience is the determinative factor for God’s forgiveness.

 

The “Grace-Within-Nature” Scheme

These two statements, i.e. God is in every person and obeying one’s conscience is what really matters, are thus part of a coherent “dogma” of human goodness and universal salvation.

What is important to observe is not so much the details of each statement, rather the general theological vision that lies at its core. Traditionally, Roman Catholicism has worked within the nature-grace scheme largely dependent on its pontifically ratified Thomistic tradition. According to this theological meta-narrative, nature, although partially flawed by sin, is elevated by grace to its supernatural end and the sacramental system of the Church is the way in which grace operates this elevation.

Moreover, in the XX century, this scheme was significantly modified and received an important endorsement at Vatican II. Whereas the old scheme implied that grace needed to be “added” to nature, the new version claims that grace is already part of nature and works within itself, not as something extrinsic but intrinsic to it. Grace is inherent to nature and through the sacramental system of the Church which unfolds itself more and more.

One advocate of a “grace-within-nature” framework was Karl Rahner (1904-1984), himself a Jesuit as well. His view of the “anonymous Christian” stated that each human being, for its being a human being, is already graced and therefore a Christian even though he is not aware of it or does not want to be such.

While not using the Rahnerian language, Pope Francis works within a similar “dogmatic” framework. God is present in everyone and one’s conscience is what will ultimately count. In spite of all its missional allure and merciful attitude, what Francis is saying is not good news for Gospel centered people.

65. La salvación universal y el papa Francisco

12 DE OCTUBRE DE 2013

Los Papas anteriores comunicaban su pensamiento únicamente mediante las páginas impresas de sus encíclicas y sus discursos oficiales. Uno de los principales cambios que está introduciendo el Papa Francisco es revertir el equilibrio; él habla más a través de la prensa.

Hace poco, su respuesta al editor del periódico italiano  La Repubblica  y las entrevistas concedidas a diferentes publicaciones jesuitas demostraron esta tendencia y el interés generado entre los medios de difusión es evidente.

Cuanto más habla el Papa Francisco, más clara resulta su teología.Siempre ha dicho que los dogmas tradicionales y el Catecismo están en el fondo de lo que él afirma y que nada sustancial cambia en sus comentarios sobre la infinita misericordia de Dios y la bondad dentro de cada ser humano. Pero, esto es verdad solamente en parte.

Diferentes intérpretes católico romanos siempre han jugado con la tarea de poner distintos acentos en la misma partitura y Francisco está poniendo deliberadamente su acento preferido  -fortissimo-  en otro dogma fundamental. En vista de su marianismo y del enfoque de su mentalidad sobre la misión, ya elaborados, los dos últimos informes escritos y las entrevistas han arrojado más luz sobre su punto de vista básico de la relación entre la naturaleza y la gracia.

“UNA CERTEZA DOGMÁTICA”
Hablando a los periodistas, compañeros suyos jesuitas, procedentes de todo el mundo (19 Set.), el Papa Francisco dijo muchas cosas y estos comentarios están atrayendo una gran cantidad de reseñas positivas. A continuación nos centraremos en una en particular:

“Tengo una certeza dogmática: Dios está presente en la vida de cada una de las personas. Dios está en la vida de todos. Aun cuando la vida de una persona haya sido un desastre, incluso si está destrozada por vicios, drogas o algo más, Dios está en la vida de esta persona. Tú puedes, tú debes intentar buscar a Dios en cada vida humana. Aunque la vida de una persona es una tierra llena de espinas y maleza, siempre hay un espacio en el cual la buena semilla puede crecer”.

Este Papa no es alguien a quien le guste el lenguaje dogmático, al menos en la superficie. Sin embargo, aquí utiliza el lenguaje más enérgico posible. Realmente quiere significar lo que está diciendo. Dios está en la vida de cada uno.

Esta declaración sin reservas plantea preguntas sobre lo que piensa el Papa de la naturaleza del pecado en la vida humana y de la realidad de nuestro “alejamiento” de Dios en nuestro pecado (p.e. Romanos 3:23). Mientras enseña que los que creen en El serán salvos, la Biblia dice claramente que somos enemigos de Dios porque somos pecadores y, por lo tanto, estamos bajo su juicio. En su lugar, el Papa quiere afirmar el dogma de que Dios está presente porque siempre existe algo “bueno” residual en el hombre.

“OBEDECER A LA PROPIA CONCIENCIA”
Otro comentario efectuado por el Papa Francisco refuerza su punto de vista dogmático acerca de la inherente apertura del hombre a la presencia de Dios. En respuesta al editor de  La Repubblica  (11 Set.), escribe lo siguiente:

“Me pregunta si el Dios de los cristianos perdona a alguien que no cree y no busca la fe. Premisa de que, y esto es lo fundamental, la misericordia de Dios no tiene límites si uno vuelve a él con un corazón sincero y contrito; la cuestión para alguien que no cree en Dios radica en obedecer la propia conciencia. El pecado, también para los que no tienen fe, existe cuando se va contra la propia conciencia. Escucharla y obedecerla significa, en realidad, decidir frente a lo que se percibe como bueno o malo”.

Poniéndolo más sencillo: obedecer la propia conciencia es lo que Dios tendrá en cuenta en la concesión del perdón. Nótese que aquí el Papa no está hablando de los que nunca han oído el evangelio, sino de aquellos que no creen sabiendo lo que hacen. Aparentemente, ir contra la propia conciencia cuenta más que ir contra la revelación de Dios. A pesar de que la Biblia enseña que no hay excusa delante del justo juicio de Dios (p.e. Romanos 2:1), Francisco dice en esta ocasión que la conciencia es el último juez a quien Dios someterá a sí mismo. La conciencia humana es el factor determinante para el perdón de Dios.

EL ESQUEMA DE LA “GRACIA DENTRO DE LA NATURALEZA”
Estas dos declaraciones, o sea, que Dios está en cada persona y obedecer la propia conciencia es lo que realmente importa son, en consecuencia, parte de un “dogma” coherente de bondad humana y salvación universal.

Lo que es importante observar no es tanto los detalles de cada afirmación, sino más bien la visión teológica general que se encuentra en su núcleo. Tradicionalmente, el catolicismo romano ha trabajado dentro del esquema naturaleza-graciadependiente en gran medida de su tradición tomista pontificalmente ratificada. Según esta metanarrativa teológica, la naturaleza, aunque defectuosa debido al pecado, es elevada por la gracia a su fin sobrenatural y el sistema sacramental de la Iglesia es la forma en que la gracia opera esta elevación.

Además, en el siglo XX, este esquema fue modificado significativamente y recibió un importante respaldo en el Vaticano II. Mientras que el esquema antiguo implicaba que la gracia necesitaba ser “adicional” a la naturaleza, la nueva versión reclama que la gracia es ya parte de la naturaleza y trabaja dentro de sí misma, no como algo extrínseco sino intrínseco a ella. La gracia es inherente a la naturaleza y a través del sistema sacramental de la Iglesia se despliega cada vez más.

Un defensor de la estructura “la gracia dentro de la naturaleza” fue Karl Rahner (1904-1984), también jesuita. Su visión del “cristiano anónimo” afirma que a cada ser humano, por el hecho de serlo, ya se le concede la gracia y por tanto es cristiano, aun cuando no sea consciente de ello o no quiera serlo.

Si bien no utiliza el idioma rahneriano, el Papa Francisco opera dentro de un marco “dogmático” similar. Dios está presente en todas las personas y la conciencia de cada uno es lo que en definitiva contará. A pesar de todo su atractivo misionero y su actitud misericordiosa, lo que Francisco dice no son buenas nuevas para las personas centradas en el Evangelio.

Traducción: Rosa Gubianas

64. Between Trent and Aparecida. The Trajectory of Pope Francis

August 26th, 2013

Since his election Pope Francis has been impressing the public opinion with his extrovert attitudes, simple habits and charming language. The recent World Youth Day (WYD) in Brazil confirmed each of these attributes. Most people seem to admire the new “franciscan” style of the Papacy, i.e. a blend of frugal manners, emphasis on mercy, and apparent approachability. Few, however, have taken the time to deal with Francis’ theological vision that is inspiring his papacy.

The Tridentine Background …

An initial step to embarking on such a task is reading his first encyclical Lumen Fidei (July 5th, 2013), in which Francis (with Benedict XVI, who is the main drafter of the document), among other things, updates the theology of the Council of Trent. In this highly authoritative document he reiterates the doctrine of salvation by faith through sacraments and works, thus renewing the Catholic rejection of the Protestant Sola Fide, i.e. the good news that we are saved by grace alone through faith alone. The attachment to Trent and the Counter-Reformation may seem remote if not alien to Francis (although we should never forget that he belongs to the Jesuit order), but the hard theological evidence says the contrary. In the foundational doctrine of salvation, Trent is still alive and well, perhaps in the friendlier tone of Pope Bergoglio, but it is there, untouched as ever. While the outlook of the Papacy is showing signs of change, the doctrinal core of the Church of Rome has been confirmed without significant developments.

… and The Vision of Aparecida

The WYD provided another important reference point that is at the heart of Francis’ program and therefore must be considered. From Trent, in the middle of the Italian Alps, we journey to Aparecida (Brazil), “on the other side of the world”, as Francis would put it. In 2007 the Latin American Bishops met in Aparecida for their Fifth General Conference, where the then Cardinal Bergoglio was one of the main inspirers of the final document. It is a 165 page text that aptly defines Francis in terms of his theological language, pastoral emphases, and missionary agenda. Aparecida accurately depicts the theological vision of the Pope. Because of its importance we shall look at it more carefully in a future Vatican File.

For Francis, though, Aparecida is not only a foundational document, it is first and foremost a Marian shrine which was built to keep a statue of Mary that according to tradition was found in 1717 by a group of three fishermen. Since 2011, it has become the greatest Marian pilgrimage destination in the world. During the WYD week, in his speech to the Brazilian Bishops on July 27th, Francis said that “Aparecida is the interpretative key for the Church’s mission”. There is something important to be found there; something that helps in understanding what the Church is all about in terms of its mission.

In explaining the intent of his comment, the Pope went on to say that “in Aparecida God offered Brazil his own mother” and revealed “his own DNA”. The Gospel, though, is about God giving His Son to the world, but Francis here speaks of God offering his mother. This not merely a matter of theological minutiae!

According to the Pope, the lesson of Aparedica has to do with the humility of the fishermen and their zeal to tell others about their discovery. This is the “interpretative key for the Church’s mission”: humility and mission. Notice, however, that we are talking about the recovery of a statue of Mary which has become a world-famous attraction for millions of people. The Gospel is about a group of humble fishermen being called by Jesus to follow him and to tell others about Him. Francis is here talking about people who found Mary and became missionaries for her. Again, this is no small difference!

Territorial Marianism

Aparecida is the national Shrine of Our Lady of Aparecida, a Marian center which is very dear to Pope Bergoglio. Prior to WYD, in his speech there on July 24th, Francis said: “What joy I feel as I come to the house of the Mother of every Brazilian, the Shrine of our Lady of Aparecida! The day after my election as Bishop of Rome, I visited the Basilica of Saint Mary Major in Rome, in order to entrust my ministry as the Successor of Peter to Our Lady. Today I have come here to ask Mary our Mother for the success of World Youth Day and to place at her feet the life of the people of Latin America”.

Here we find some common threads of Francis’ Marianism:

–          the priority of his Marian devotion

–          his first act as Pope was a Marian act

–          his belief that the Papal office should be entrusted to Mary

–          his prayer to Mary for the success of WYD

–          his dedicating to Mary the people of Latin America.

This sentence summarizes the core of Francis’ Marianism. What is even more striking, though, is his “territorial” understanding of Aparecida. When he says that Mary is the Mother of “every Brazilian”, he is applying a “territorial” understanding of his religion, as if every Brazilian, in spite of religious pluralism that marks Brazil, is nonetheless a child of Mary. This attitude reflects how it is difficult for a Roman Catholic majority culture to accept the fact that Mary may be the mother of the Roman Catholic Brazilians, but not of those who may have a high respect for the biblical Mary without turning it into someone to be venerated.

When Pope Francis speaks extensively of “mission”, “outreach”, and “encounter with Christ” – a language that seems very Evangelical – one should be aware that the background of it all lies between Trent and Aparecida. He stands between the Counter-Reformation emphasis on a synergistic Gospel and the “missional” attitude that can be found in his thoroughgoing Marianism.